References

• Batzella, F. (2022). Engaged but constrained. Assessing EU actorness in the case of Nord Stream 2. Journal of European Integration, 44(6), 821-835. https://doi.org/10.1080/07036337.2022.2043853
• Congressional Research Service. (2021). Russia's War Against Ukraine: European Union Responses and U.S.- EU Relations (Report No. IN11897). https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/IN/IN11897
• Aram, L., & Kim, J. (2023). Analysis of Bargaining Power between the EU and Russia by Altering Gas Supply Network Structure. Sustainability, 15(5), 4655 https://doi.org/10.3390/su15054655
• Lehne, S. (2023, February 28). After Russia’s War Against Ukraine: What Kind of World Order? Carnegie Europe. https://carnegieeurope.eu/2023/02/28/after-russia-s-war-against-ukraine-what-kind-of-world-order-pub-83949
• Siddi, M. (2019). Theorising conflict and cooperation in EU-Russia energy relations: ideas, identities and material factors in the Nord Stream 2 debate. East European Politics, 36(4), 544–563. https://doi.org/10.1080/21599165.2019.1700955
• Maurer, H., Whitman, R., & Wright, N. (2023). The EU and the invasion of Ukraine: a collective responsibility to act? International Affairs, 99(1), 219–238. https://doi.org/10.1093/ia/iiac262
• Ostrowski, W. (2020). The Twenty years’ crisis of European energy Security: Central and Eastern Europe and the US. Geopolitics, 27(3), 875–897. https://doi.org/10.1080/14650045.2020.1835863
• Quitzow, R., & Thielges, S. (2020). The German energy transition as a soft power. Review of International Political Economy, 29(2), 598–623. https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290.2020.1813190
• Shagina, M., & Westphal, K. (2021). Nord Stream 2 and the Energy Security Dilemma. SWP. https://www.swp-berlin.org/10.18449/2021C46/
• Szabo, S. F. (2014). Germany’s commercial realism and the Russia problem. Survival, 56(5), 117–128. https://doi.org/10.1080/00396338.2014.962799
• Szulecki, K., & Øverland, I. (2023). Russian nuclear energy diplomacy and its implications for energy security in the context of the war in Ukraine. Nature Energy, 8(4), 413–421. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-023-01228-5
• US Institute of Peace. (2023). Case Study: Ukraine. In Elite Capture and Corruption of Security Sectors (pp. 113–142). US Institute of Peace. http://www.jstor.org/stable/resrep47379.16
• Vihma, A., & Wigell, M. (2016). Unclear and present danger: Russia’s geoeconomics and the Nord Stream II pipeline. Global Affairs, 2(4), 377–388. https://doi.org/10.1080/23340460.2016.1251073
• Virág, A., & Tancsa, G. (2023). Turbulent energy transformations in Central Europe: Nord Stream projects in the context of geopolitics. Politics in Central Europe, 19(1), 113–144. https://doi.org/10.2478/pce-2023-0006
• Vosoughi, S., & Mousaei, A. (2022). The Nord Stream 2 Project and the Interests of Germany, Russia, the European Union and the United States. Central Eurasia Studies, 15(1), 361-386. doi: 10.22059/jcep.2022.345947.450086
• Walsh, J. 2022. German President calls support for Nord Stream 2 “Clearly a Mistake”, 4 April.
• Yafimava, K. (2018). 3. New pipeline capacity in the EU (planned and under construction): case studies case studies from Building New Gas Transportation Infrastructure in the EU — what are the rules of the game? on JSTOR. (n.d.). www.jstor.org. http://www.jstor.org/stable/resrep30967.9