Geopolitics of Connectivity in the 21st Century and the Changing World Order
This paper seeks to explore the importance and utilization of global connectivity in terms of economic, infrastructural, digital, and strategic levels for geopolitical goals by major powers and its possible implications. This is done so in the context of the rising multi-polarity and the supposed decline of the US status as the preeminent power in the existing world order. The paper explores the Chinese strategy to overcome its natural geographic disadvantages through the colossal undertaking of OBOR as well as how this project has inspired the emergence of various other supporting as well as competing trade routes. The United States seems to be reverting its successful Cold War era strategy of containment against China albeit through the use of forming strategic alliances and using proxy wars in strategic regions for this purpose while analyzing the risks associated with this strategy as well as possible alternatives available to the United States.
-
Global Connectivity, Geopolitical Goals, Cold War, Proxy Wars
-
(1) Muhammad Rehan Zafar
PhD Scholar, Area Study Center, Quaid-e-Azam University Islamabad, Pakistan.
(2) Noman Omar Sattar
Associate Professor (Rtd), Area Study Center, Quaid-e-Azam University, Islamabad, Pakistan.
-
Bayramli, N. (2024, May 7). Afghanistan's first transit rail cargo leaves for the Iran-Türkiye border. Caspian News. https://caspiannews.com/news-detail/afghanistans-first-transit-rail-cargo-leaves-for-iran-turkiye-border-2024-5-7-0/
- Beckwith, C. I. (2009). Empires of the Silk Road: A History of Central Eurasia from the Bronze Age to the present. Princeton University Press.
- Bibi, H., Khan, S., & Baloch, Z. (2024). CPEC at crossroads: Assessing the ten-year journey, challenges, and prospects for sustainable development in Pakistan. Kurdish Studies, 12(4), 410-416. https://doi.org/10.53555/ks.v12i4.2968
- Bruegel. (2021, October 18). The end of Russian gas transit through Ukraine and options for the EU. Bruegel. https://www.bruegel.org/analysis/end-russian-gas-transit-ukraine-and-options-eu
- Central Asia-Caucasus Institute (CACI). (2024, March 7). China’s debt-trap diplomacy in Central Asia. The Central Asia-Caucasus Analyst. https://www.cacianalyst.org/publications/analytical-articles/item/13823-chinas-debt-trap-diplomacy-in-central-asia.html
- Chatham House. (2024, September). The US dollar's dominance: Both cause and consequence of US power. Chatham House. https://www.chathamhouse.org/2024/09/us-dollar-dominance-both-cause-and-consequence-us-power
- Cohen, S. B. (1963). Geography and politics in a divided world (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press Inc.
- Connolly, D., & Lee, J. (2016). Pipeline Politics between Europe and Russia: A Historical Review from the Cold War to the Post-Cold War. Deleted Journal, 14(1), 105. https://doi.org/10.14731/kjis.2016.4.14.1.105
- Council on Foreign Relations (CFR). (2022, February 23). Ukraine: Conflict at the crossroads of Europe and Russia. Council on Foreign Relations. https://www.cfr.org/backgrounder/ukraine-conflict-crossroads-europe-and-russia
- Council on Foreign Relations (CFR). (2024, February 23). Two years of war in Ukraine: Are sanctions against Russia making a difference? Council on Foreign Relations. https://www.cfr.org/in-brief/two-years-war-ukraine-are-sanctions-against-russia-making-difference
- Dalio, R. (2021). Principles for dealing with the changing world order: Why nations succeed and fail. Avid Reader Press.
- Defense Technical Information Center (DTIC). (2006). Energy futures for Asia: Identifying opportunities for U.S.-Japan cooperation. Defense Technical Information Center. https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/tr/pdf/ADA451318.pdf
- Ericson, R. E. (2009). Eurasian Natural Gas Pipelines: The political economy of network interdependence. Eurasian Geography and Economics, 50(1), 28–57. https://doi.org/10.2747/1539-7216.50.1.28
- European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD). (n.d.). Belt and Road Initiative: Overview. European Bank for Reconstruction and Development. https://www.ebrd.com/what-we-do/belt-and-road/overview.html
- Hao, N. V., Loan, N. T. C., & Duc, N. H. (2023). The Geopolitical Future of the Mankind in the Twenty-first Century: the Views of Zbigniew Brzezinski in his Work “The Great Chessboard.” In Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG eBooks (pp. 15–26). https://doi.org/10.5771/9783748916987-15
- He, A. (2020). The Belt and Road Initiative: Motivations, financing, expansion and challenges of Xi’s ever-expanding strategy. Journal of Infrastructure Policy and Development, 4(1), 139. https://doi.org/10.24294/jipd.v4i1.1180
- Hobson, R. (2021). Imperialism at sea: Naval strategic thought, the ideology of sea power, and the Tirpitz Plan, 1875-1914 (Vol. 25). Brill.
- Hussein, S. I., & Farahat, A. (2024). BRICS vs. the US dollar: Analyzing the potential of a BRICS reserve currency and leadership challenges that may arise (Master's thesis). Handelshøyskolen BI. https://biopen.bi.no/bi-xmlui/handle/11250/3167598
- International Road Transport Union (IRU). (2023, November 16). New corridors for global trade. IRU Newsroom. https://www.iru.org/news-resources/newsroom/new-corridors-global-trade
- Islamov, B. (2001). Central Asia: Problems of external debt and its implications. Notes, 16(85), 111-116.
- Khanna, P. (2021). Move: The forces uprooting us. Simon & Schuster.
- Leonard, M. (2016). Connectivity wars: Why migration, finance and trade are the geo-economic battlegrounds of the future. European Council on Foreign Relations. https://ecfr.eu/wp-content/uploads/Connectivity_Wars.pdf
- Perth USAsia Centre. (2024, August 22). The Quad, AUKUS, and the future of alliances in the Indo-Pacific. Perth USAsia Centre. https://perthusasia.edu.au/research-insights/the-quad-aukus-and-the-future-of-alliances-in-the-indo-pacific/
- Peters, M. A. (2021). The geopolitical rebirth of the Anglosphere as a world actor after Brexit. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 55(11), 1193–1196. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2021.1991791
- Planète Energies. (n.d.). Gas pipelines between Europe, Russia, and Caucasia. Planète Energies. https://www.planete-energies.com/en/media/infographic/gas-pipelines-between-europe-russia-and-caucasia
- Tertitskiy, F. (2024, November 7). Why is North Korea sending troops to fight for Russia? Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. https://carnegieendowment.org/russia-eurasia/politika/2024/11/russia-north-korea-new-allies?lang=en
- The New York Times. (2024, December 18). Syria’s civil war: Rebels, factions, and the battle for the future. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/article/syria-civil-war-rebels.html
- Wei, L. (2019). Towards economic decoupling? Mapping Chinese discourse on the China–US trade war. The Chinese Journal of International Politics, 12(4), 519–556. https://doi.org/10.1093/cjip/poz017
- Wibisono, A. N. (2019). China’s “Belt and Road Initiative” in Sri Lanka : Debt Diplomacy in Hambantota Port investment. Mandala: Jurnal Ilmu Hubungan Internasional, 222–245. https://doi.org/10.33822/mjihi.v2i2.1482
- World Bank. (2020). Belt and Road Economics: Opportunities and risks of transport corridors. World Bank. https://www.worldbank.org/en/topic/regional-integration/publication/belt-and-road-economics-opportunities-and-risks-of-transport-corridors
Cite this article
-
APA : Zafar, M. R., & Sattar, N. O. (2024). Geopolitics of Connectivity in the 21st Century and the Changing World Order. Global Foreign Policies Review, VII(IV), 37-47. https://doi.org/10.31703/gfpr.2024(VII-IV).05
-
CHICAGO : Zafar, Muhammad Rehan, and Noman Omar Sattar. 2024. "Geopolitics of Connectivity in the 21st Century and the Changing World Order." Global Foreign Policies Review, VII (IV): 37-47 doi: 10.31703/gfpr.2024(VII-IV).05
-
HARVARD : ZAFAR, M. R. & SATTAR, N. O. 2024. Geopolitics of Connectivity in the 21st Century and the Changing World Order. Global Foreign Policies Review, VII, 37-47.
-
MHRA : Zafar, Muhammad Rehan, and Noman Omar Sattar. 2024. "Geopolitics of Connectivity in the 21st Century and the Changing World Order." Global Foreign Policies Review, VII: 37-47
-
MLA : Zafar, Muhammad Rehan, and Noman Omar Sattar. "Geopolitics of Connectivity in the 21st Century and the Changing World Order." Global Foreign Policies Review, VII.IV (2024): 37-47 Print.
-
OXFORD : Zafar, Muhammad Rehan and Sattar, Noman Omar (2024), "Geopolitics of Connectivity in the 21st Century and the Changing World Order", Global Foreign Policies Review, VII (IV), 37-47
-
TURABIAN : Zafar, Muhammad Rehan, and Noman Omar Sattar. "Geopolitics of Connectivity in the 21st Century and the Changing World Order." Global Foreign Policies Review VII, no. IV (2024): 37-47. https://doi.org/10.31703/gfpr.2024(VII-IV).05