http://dx.doi.org/10.31703/gfpr.2022(V-IV).04
10.31703/gfpr.2022(V-IV).04
Published : Dec 2022
Conceptualization of Eurasian Economic Union and OBOR as the New Economic Silk Road: Repercussions for Sino-Russia Relations
From the last few years, both states, China and Russia, have inaugurated China, Russia Eurasian indigenous system which is fostered as a means to the major Economic Union; one belt strengthens liaison with neighboring countries. The Eurasian one road; Silk Road "Economic Union( EEU)" unites the members of the countries into the intertwined solo enterprise; Central Asia requests furnishing a concept of free market, trade and freely movement of labor. One belt and One Road of China consists of two major systems in which one is maritime based while other is the land based. Both, land based and maritime based gambles concentrate on large scale construction and structure endeavor, which is majorly financed by Asian Investment Banks. The article provides a comprehensive analysis of the motivations and implications of these two significant economic ventures in the Eurasian region.
-
EEU, Silk Road, Russian-Chinese Cooperation
-
(1) Mariam Tahir
Lecturer, Department of Peace & Conflict Studies, National University of Modern Languages, Islamabad, Pakistan.
(2) Ashfaq Ahmad
Lecturer, Department of Peace & Conflict Studies, National University of Modern Languages, Islamabad, Pakistan.
(3) Muhammad Haroon
MS Scholar National Institute of Pakistan Studies (NIPS), Quaid-i-Azam University, Islamabad, Pakistan.
- Akapov, P. (2014, September 1). Kazakhstan October 6, 2014. http://vz.ru/politics/2014/0/1/703382.html
- Alexandrova, L. (2015, December 16). Experts say China’s proposal on free trade area within SCO needs careful study. TASS. http://tass.ru/en/opinions/844612
- Almaganbetov, A., & Kurmanov, B. (2015, February 28). China challenges Russian influence in Kazakhstan. East Asia Forum.
- Arase, D. (2015). China’s two Silk Roads initiative: What it means for Southeast Asia. Southeast Asian Affairs, 25–45. https://www.jstor.org/stable/44112796
- Banyan. (2014, May). Where three is a crowd. The Economist.
- Callahan, W. (2015). Identity and security in China: The negative soft power of the China dream. Politics, 35(3–4), 216– 229. http://10.1111/1467-9256.12088
- Charap, S., & Troitskiy, M. (2013). Russia, the west and the integration Dilemma. Survival: Global Politics and Strategy, 55(6), 49–62. https://doi.org/10.1080/00396338.2013.862935
- Economy, E., & Levi, M. (2014). By all means necessary: How China’s resource quest is transforming the world. Oxford University Press.
- Gabuev, A. (2015, December 30). 2016: Where China will clash with Russia. Carnegie Moscow Center
- Gabuev, A. (2015, March 25). Russia’s policy towards China: Key players and he decision-making process. The Asian Forum. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-3144-1_4
- Kovaleva, V. D. (2018). Current Issues of Economic Security of the Eurasian Economic Union. International Journal of Engineering & Technology, 343-346. https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i3.14.17023
- Laurelle, M. (2015, May). The ‘Russian world’: Russia’s soft power and geopolitical imagination. Center on Global Interests.
- Li, M. (2015, March 11). China ‘one belt, one road’ initiative: New round of opening up? RSIS Comentary, No. 050. https://hdl.handle.net/10356/82035
- Sijbren, D. J. (2016). The Eurasian Economic Union and the European Union: Geopolitics, Geo-Economics and Opportunities for Europe. Swedish Institute for European Policy Studies, 1- 12.
- Trenin, D. (2011). Post-imperium. Carnegie Institute Press
- Vinokurov, E. (2017). Eurasian Economic Union: Current state and preliminary results. Russian Journal of Economics, 54- 70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ruje.2017.02.004
- Yilmaz, S. (2017). Eurasian Economic Union: A Regional Economic Hegemony Initiative. Journal of Eastern European and Central Asian Research. https://doi.org/10.15549/jeecar.v4i2.166
- Zoellick, R. (2005, September 21). Whither China: From membership to responsibility. US Department of State.
Cite this article
-
APA : Tahir, M., Ahmad, A., & Haroon, M. (2022). Conceptualization of Eurasian Economic Union and OBOR as the New Economic Silk Road: Repercussions for Sino-Russia Relations. Global Foreign Policies Review, V(IV), 27-35. https://doi.org/10.31703/gfpr.2022(V-IV).04
-
CHICAGO : Tahir, Mariam, Ashfaq Ahmad, and Muhammad Haroon. 2022. "Conceptualization of Eurasian Economic Union and OBOR as the New Economic Silk Road: Repercussions for Sino-Russia Relations." Global Foreign Policies Review, V (IV): 27-35 doi: 10.31703/gfpr.2022(V-IV).04
-
HARVARD : TAHIR, M., AHMAD, A. & HAROON, M. 2022. Conceptualization of Eurasian Economic Union and OBOR as the New Economic Silk Road: Repercussions for Sino-Russia Relations. Global Foreign Policies Review, V, 27-35.
-
MHRA : Tahir, Mariam, Ashfaq Ahmad, and Muhammad Haroon. 2022. "Conceptualization of Eurasian Economic Union and OBOR as the New Economic Silk Road: Repercussions for Sino-Russia Relations." Global Foreign Policies Review, V: 27-35
-
MLA : Tahir, Mariam, Ashfaq Ahmad, and Muhammad Haroon. "Conceptualization of Eurasian Economic Union and OBOR as the New Economic Silk Road: Repercussions for Sino-Russia Relations." Global Foreign Policies Review, V.IV (2022): 27-35 Print.
-
OXFORD : Tahir, Mariam, Ahmad, Ashfaq, and Haroon, Muhammad (2022), "Conceptualization of Eurasian Economic Union and OBOR as the New Economic Silk Road: Repercussions for Sino-Russia Relations", Global Foreign Policies Review, V (IV), 27-35
-
TURABIAN : Tahir, Mariam, Ashfaq Ahmad, and Muhammad Haroon. "Conceptualization of Eurasian Economic Union and OBOR as the New Economic Silk Road: Repercussions for Sino-Russia Relations." Global Foreign Policies Review V, no. IV (2022): 27-35. https://doi.org/10.31703/gfpr.2022(V-IV).04